fbpx

Call Us Now: 716.208.3525

EEOICPA & RECA Attorneys

Stephens & Stephens has obtained over $60 million through the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act and the Energy Employees Occupation Illness Compensation Act for our clients

Dee GodfreyDee Godfrey
18:49 12 Mar 24
I was astounded with the service I received from Mr. Hugh Stephens in regard to my husband's compensation claim. He was not only efficient, but also compassionate, and communicated clearly and frequently. Because of his outstanding efforts and expertise, I, who am now a grieving widow, am unexpectedly stabile and secure. I had little to do. He did all the heavy lifting. I'm so very grateful for his help. I'll always remember not only his professionalism, but also his kindness.
Audrey OgletreeAudrey Ogletree
22:19 09 Mar 24
From: Laurence OgletreeI received good assistance from Stephens & Stephens in submitting the recent claim for increased impairment benefits from the Energy Workers program.
Randy MooreRandy Moore
14:48 07 Mar 24
I was a machinist at Honeywell F.M.&T.and developed bilateral tinnitus and bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. They helped me file a claim with EEOICPA in 2017. Stephen’s & Stephen’s was very good to work with, they take care of all the paperwork and help with any paperwork I receive from the Department of Labor. They stay on top of things helping with scheduling impairment reviews etc.I feel that without their help this would have been a very overwhelming process.I plan on still using them if any other illnesses occur due to my employment with Honeywell.
Mike DauzatMike Dauzat
15:54 02 Mar 24
I highly recommend Stevens and Stevens. Hugh Stevens and his staff are very professional and very friendly. They're extremely good at making sure you get the full amount of money you deserve. If you need a DOL lawyer, I highly recommend this team. I can't be more happy that I picked Stevens and Stevens.
Mary YbarraMary Ybarra
01:33 27 Feb 24
Stephen’s and Stephen’s has kept fight for my dad. Now they are fight for my mom. They are on top of things and I would recommend them to anyone who needs help and guidance with the Uranium mines.
Dianne HarperDianne Harper
01:02 17 Feb 24
Robert and I are very pleased with Mr. Hugh Stephens and all that he has done for us. From the first moment we spoke, we sensed that though Mr. Stephens exhibits sharp business acumen, he cares deeply about his clients and he has a huge heart.
Diane pontonDiane ponton
17:38 07 Feb 24
I tried to get others to help me with this claim, and it wasn"t until I hired Mr. Stephens that things started happening. I would recommend any one to get in touch with him . I would go to him again, if i ever needed to.
Judy LeonardJudy Leonard
22:26 06 Feb 24
I very much appreciate the successful litigation concerning my husband's Hanford work related illness. Stephens & Stephens LLP were thorough, caring, considerate, and fair during this difficult time.
Kenneth GKenneth G
18:23 03 Feb 24
Mr. Stephens was able to simplify an otherwise complicated lengthy process (DEEOIC) to file an initial claim as well as a claim for impairment benefits.
dave DONAIDdave DONAID
18:08 03 Feb 24
Frankie KnucFrankie Knuc
19:24 08 Jan 24
I had other attorneys hired in Cortez, Colorado and Grand Jct., Colorado to assist me with receiving my uranium claim, but they were not successful. I was advised by an employee of CNS of Stephens & Stephens, LLP good work. I contacted them & they took my case It was settled very quickly. I have been very pleased with this group & would advise others of their prompt service. I would recommend them to others. Respectfully, Frankie Knuckles
Rebecca ConsolRebecca Consol
19:57 22 Dec 23
My family used Stephen’s and Stephen’s for a settlement case. We were extremely pleased with all they did. They were very professional, easy to get a hold of, and invaluable when it came to answering questions and handling complicated Department of Labor issues and forms. They also did everything in a very timely manner. I have already recommended them to other people.
Thomas CliffordThomas Clifford
15:29 21 Dec 23
I have been represented by Hugh Stevens for several years now, He and his staff has made everything so easy for me. I had lung cancer from working in the uranium processing industry, they have opened so many doors for me and made dealing with DOL so much easier. They always answer my questions in a very timely manner. I have referred several other people to him and he has been able to get them through this process also. There are benefits that I was not aware of that he has brought to my attention and been able to lead me through the process of obtaining them. I would most highly recommend him to lead anyone through this process.
Lonnie killingHawkLonnie killingHawk
02:35 14 Dec 23
When I first contacted Stephens & Stephens I was at the end of my rope with DOL. Hough and his staff got me on track and handled everything with DOL and just made this process so easy. Do not know where I'd be with out them. They are able to communicate at a layman's level and understand the client. Would strongly recommend this firm.
Ruthy LyonRuthy Lyon
21:00 28 Sep 23
Our initial conversation with Mr. Stephens was productive & reassuring. His previous experience with similar cases was obvious and very helpful, in both asking us specific questions for clarification & also addressing our own questions. Breanna is also a great asset to their team.
James O'DayJames O'Day
15:07 13 Sep 23
I have referred several friends to Hugh Stephens and they were more satisfied than they ever expected. I would refer him with confidence to anyone in need. I trust when he speaks for me, for example, in court. He is a good communicator and a deep thinker. He is well respected in his profession. He handles environmental law, injury law, and medical malpractice. He is tactful and direct and knows what he is doing. He knows the legal briar patches well.
js_loader

EEOICPA Covered Facilities: Brookhaven National Laboratory

Brookhaven National Laboratory is a government facility that was built in 1947 in Upton, New York, for the purposes of researching nuclear and high-energy physics, energy science and technology, environmental and bioscience, nanoscience, and national security.

During the early years of operation at Brookhaven National Laboratory, hazardous waste disposal practices were not as stringent as they are today and may have resulted in employees, scientists, and residents being exposed to a higher risk of cancer. Common cancers being reported by facility workers include: bone cancer, renal cancer, and leukemia.

Here, we have compiled publicly available information and documentation about the facilities covered by the Act to clarify how their activities relate to the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act.

Brookhaven National Laboratory

State: New York
Location: Upton
Time Period: 1947-present
Facility Type: Department of Energy

Facility Description: Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) is the former site of a U.S. Army installation (Camp Upton) and has been involved in research and development activities in support of the Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor agencies since 1947. BNL’s facilities conduct basic and applied research in high energy and nuclear physics and in other areas of science.

Throughout the course of its operations, the potential for beryllium exposure existed at this site, due to beryllium use, residual contamination, and decontamination activities.

CONTRACTORS: Brookhaven Science Association (Battelle Memorial Institute and State University of New York at Stony Brook)(1998-Present); Associated Universities, Incorporated (1947-1998)

Listing:
The Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) is listed as a Department of Energy (DOE) site under the EEOICPA.

Special Exposure Cohort(SEC) Classes:
The SEC classes for BNL include all employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and its contractors and subcontractors who worked at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, New York, from January 1, 1947 to December 31, 1979, and from January 1, 1980 through December 31, 1993 for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment, or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort.

Compensation:
As of 01/11/2023, the total compensation paid under Parts B and E of the EEOICPA, including medical compensation, for workers suffering from the effects of having worked at the Brookhaven National Laboratory is $318,142,764. Click here for a current accounting of compensation paid to former Brookhaven National Laboratory Workers under the EEOICPA.

Brookhaven National Laboratory Workers:
If you or your parent worked at this or any other DOE or AWE facility and became ill, you may be entitled to compensation of up to $400K plus medical benefits from the US Department of Labor. Call EEOICPA Counsel Hugh Stephens at 1-855-EEOICPA (336-4272) or fill out the form to the right, whether your claim has been accepted or denied.

We can help with all OWCP (Federal Workers Compensation) claims, impairments, wage loss and health care. 2495 Main Street, Suite 442 Buffalo, NY 14214.

History:
Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) was established at the eastern end of Long Island in 1947 at the site of Camp Upton, a former U.S. Army base, and set out to explore peaceful uses of atomic energy through research. It was originally a part of the Atomic Energy Commission but now falls under the auspices of the Department of Energy. Brookhaven has several radiological facilities including research reactors, high-energy reactors, medical isotope facilities, medical research, and waste management.

SITE DESCRIPTION AND GENERAL INFORMATION:
Research Reactors
The Laboratory’s scientific history began in 1950 with the operation of the BGRR, a research reactor used for peaceful scientific exploration in the fields of medicine, biology, chemistry, physics, and nuclear engineering. The BGRR operated until 1968. In 1965, its capacity was replaced and surpassed by the HFBR, which provided neutrons to researchers of all disciplines, from solid-state physics to art history. The HFBR ceased operations in December 1996.

Medical Research Center
Medical research at BNL began in 1950 with the opening of one of the first hospitals devoted to nuclear medicine. It was followed by the MRC in 1958 and the Brookhaven Medical Research Reactor (BMRR) in 1959. The BMRR is the first nuclear reactor built exclusively for medical and biological research. It came on line on March 15, 1959, and operated until October 2000. The Radiation Therapy Facility (RTF) was operated jointly by the BNL Medical Department and the State University of New York at Stony Brook. The RTF was a high-energy, dual X-ray mode linear accelerator (LINAC) for radiation therapy of cancer patients. The RTF has been dismantled and is not operational. Chemists and physicians teamed to view the inner workings of the brain in 1977 with the advent of PET cameras. Two more imaging techniques were added to the PET research efforts to form the Center for Imaging and Neuroscience in 1996. Except for the BMRR, all of these facilities are currently operating.

Particle Accelerators
High-energy particle physics research began in 1952 with the Cosmotron, the first particle physics accelerator to achieve billion electron-volt energies. The Cosmotron operated from 1953 to 1966. In 1960, the Alternating Gradient Synchrotron (AGS), a large accelerator, was built to surpass the Cosmotron’s capabilities. The AGS is capable of accelerating protons to energies up to 30 GeV and heavy ion beams to 15 GeV/amu. The AGS achieved full energy in 1960 and is still in use.

Between 1967 and 1970, the Tandem Van De Graaff, 60-Inch Cyclotron, and Vertical Accelerator were used for medium-energy physics investigations and for special isotope production. The heavy ions from the Tandem Van De Graaff can be injected into the AGS for physics experiments. The Tandem Van De Graaff began operating in 1970 and continues operating to the present. The Heavy Ion Transfer tunnel connects the coupled Tandem Van de Graaff and the AGS. The
interconnection of these two facilities permits intermediate-mass ions to be injected into the AGS where they can be accelerated to an energy of 15 GeV/amu. These ions then are extracted and sent to the AGS experimental area for physics research. The AGS Booster is a circular accelerator with a circumference of 200 m that receives either a proton beam from LINAC or heavy ions from the Tandem Van De Graaff. The Booster accelerates proton particles and heavy ions before injecting them into the AGS ring. The Booster receives protons and heavy ions from the LINAC and Tandem Van De Graaff facilities to increase their intensity for delivery to the AGS.

The Brookhaven LINAC Isotope Producer (BLIP) became operational in 1973. Protons from the LINAC are sent through an underground beam tunnel to the BLIP facility where they strike target metals. These metals, which become activated by the proton beam, are then processed at the Target Processing Laboratory (TPL) for use in radiopharmaceutical development and production. The targets are cooled by a continuously recirculating water system. The BLIP facility underwent significant upgrades in 1994 in support of the Brookhaven Isotope Research Center program. The 200-MeV Proton Linear Accelerator serves as a proton injector for the AGS and supplies a continuous beam of protons for radionuclide production by spallation reactions in the BLIP.

In 1982, the National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS) began operation. The NSLS guides charged particles in an orbit. As the electrons spin inside a hollow donut-shaped tube called an electron storage ring, they emit light called synchrotron light. This light, which can be detected by specialized instruments, is used to study the properties of matter. The NSLS uses a LINAC and booster synchrotron as an injection system for two electron storage rings that operate at energies of 750 MeV vacuum ultraviolet (VUV), and 2.5 GeV X-ray. The synchrotron radiation produced by their stored electrons is used for VUV spectroscopy and for X-ray diffraction studies.

Brookhaven’s newest accelerator facility is the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC), which was completed in 1999. The RHIC is designed to recreate a state of matter that scientists believe existed moments after the universe was formed.
Department of Applied Science The TPL (also called the Hot Laboratory in 1993) officially opened on January 15, 1951. The original purpose of the central facility was to provide appropriately shielded areas for research with large amounts of radioactive material. The “hot” area of the Hot Laboratory included five hot cells, three chemical-processing hot cells, and three high-level hot cells for handling and processing of radioisotopes in gaseous, liquid, or solid form. In 1971 and 1972, the High Intensity Radiation Development Laboratory (HIRDL), which contained million-curie-range (in the early 1970s) 60Co and 137Cs sources, was used for source development and experimental process irradiations. A 60Co pool in the HIRDL facility operated at lower activity levels into the 1990s.

Waste Management
The new Waste Management Facility (WMF) replaced the original Hazardous Waste Management Facility (HWMF) in its entirety and consolidated several waste management operations into functional buildings. The WMF also provides for significant expansion in a dedicated site suitable for handling and storing hazardous and radioactive wastes generated at BNL.

Aerial view of Brookhaven National Laboratory (NIOSH, 2009)
(NIOSH)

DOCUMENTS:
NIOSH SEC Petition Evaluation Report
Petition 113 (Mar 1, 1951 to Jun 30, 1960)
SEC Petition Evaluation Report – Petition SEC-00113 – Report Rev #: 0
Report Submittal Date: September 29, 2009

Petition 196 (Jan 1, 1980 to Dec 31, 1993)
SEC Petition Evaluation Report – Petition SEC-00196 – Report Rev #: 0
Report Submittal Date: January 5, 2012

Technical Basis Documents
Site Profile for the Brookhaven National Laboratory
Document Number: ORAUT-TKBS-0048 – Revision: 02
Effective Date: 02/07/2013 – Type of Document: TBD – Supersedes: Revision 01

SC&A
COMPARISON OF SC&A’S BLIND DOSE RECONSTRUCTION TO NIOSH’S DOSE RECONSTRUCTION OF CASE #[REDACT] FROM THE BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY

SC&A’S ISSUES MATRIX FOR THE BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY SITE PROFILE TECHNICAL BASIS DOCUMENT

REVIEW OF THE NIOSH SITE PROFILE FOR BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY